WHERE IS LACROSSE CANADA’ S AUDITED STATEMENT FOR 2025-26

By Pierre Filion pierrefilion@bell.net

Lacrosse Canada’s 2025-26 fiscal year ended on March 31th 2026. That is four months ago and still Lacrosse Canada has not come forward with the publication of its 2025-26 audited financial statement.

To Lacrosse Canada’s defense we all need to admit that the numerous changes within the organization might have led to this delay; the president (Matt Shearer) has been expelled, the Executive Director (Terry Rayner) has been terminated and the Technical Director (Wendy Dobbin) has also left. There is a new president (Barbara Lockhart), a new CEO (Lori Degraw) and a new Technical Director (Dave Stockton) who have stepped in and who are, somehow, trying to steer what appears to be a rudderless ship.

Those are important changes and surely indicate that questions need to be asked. Especially in the financial domain as we are waiting for the 2025-26 statement. But four months is a long time for the paying members to wait. Someone from Lacrosse Canada is probably trying to answer pointed questions presented by the external auditors! Hopefully the external auditors are asking pointed questions.

Before we go any further let’s remind ourselves what was the 2025-26 budget in order to appreciate the upcoming financial statement.

But, let’s not forget that, under Terry Rayner’s leadership, LC’s two previous financial statements had declared a 194,749$ deficit in 2024 and a devastating deficit of 850,155$ in 2025. Obviously, the corporation’s net asset has melted from 1,127,137$ to 276,982$. This will significantly affect Lacrosse Canada’s ability to invest towards the development of the game. When net assets go down so goes your autonomy! On the other hand, the Lacrosse Foundation will congratulate itself for having protected the monies it now has in the bank. Just imagine how quickly Lacrosse Canada could have ‘’spent’’ this money! Also, the paying members will never forget those deficits and that is why they are waiting patiently for Lacrosse Canada to come up with the latest figures.

The upcoming and expected audit will, you’ll remember, cover 10 months (June 2025 to March 2026). Terry Rayner was the Executive Director during that period until he was released by Lacrosse Canada on February 19th 2026.

The 2025-26 budget, approved by the members and by the Board, was at 2,426,884$. It was a balanced budget, as always.


What is surprising is that, year in and year out, Lacrosse Canada drafts balanced budget but at the end of the fiscal year ‘’discovers’’ that the approved budget was not followed and that monies were spent as if there was no budget at all. More and more I have the impression that preparing a budget is meaningless when monies can be spent ‘’outside the budget’’ until a deficit is declared.

There was a Board of Directors who seemed to totally and blindly trust the Executive Director; there was a president who signed cheques without asking if ‘’we were within budget’’. And there were the paying members who never received quarterly statements indicating where their monies were being spent.

This happened within a national association (LC) who claimed to be transparent!!!

What is also problematic is that when the audit will be produced it will list revenues and expenses against the previous year’s revenues and expenses. No where will there be an audit that the members could analyze, COMPARE WITH THE INITIAL BUDGET and then proceed to an evaluation of their leaders. And maybe ask questions! And, maybe, receive answers as to why, in two years, ‘’we’’ ran a deficit of 1,044,904$. Who was in charge of the budget? Hey, we’re talking of a million dollars now.

The 2025-26 budget called for revenues of 2,426,884$ with two important contributors supplying 94.1% of the revenues; Sport Canada (1,094,090$) and the members themselves (1,191,105$). Lacrosse Canada was planning to collect 151,689$ by itself while the National Teams were going to bring in a whooping 60,000$.

What will be interesting to see, when the audit comes out, is that in its plan to generate 151,689$ there was an amount of 104,500$ that would come from sponsors and royalties. The previous year Lacrosse Canada had generated 3,000$ in sponsorship and 758$ in royalties for a total of 3,758$. In 2025-26 someone decided that the Association was going to raise 104,500$ in sponsorship and royalties. There is not an ounce of wisdom here and LC has not indicated how it was going to raise 104,500$ in one year when the year before it raised only 3,758$. Let’s get serious here, please.

In the expense part of the budget Lacrosse Canada indicated that it was going to spend 1,078,085$ for the National Teams. That is 44.4% of the budget. But the thrilling part is there was never any indication on how and where the money was going to be spent. Yet Lacrosse Canada goes through great lengths to tell us that it will spend 1,630$ on a website transfer system and 1,000$ on postage but it totally omits to minimally indicate where 44.4% of its expenses was going to be spent. On which team? On which World Lacrosse championship? On which activity? Hey, we’re talking of a million dollars now again.

Practically speaking the Board of Directors gave the Executive Director 1,078,085$ without any guidelines or specific indications on where to spend it. And this is happening in a National Association who wishes to be credible because of its accountability to the members.

No wonder changes are happening at Lacrosse Canada; enough was enough.

In the meantime, let’s wait for the 2025-26 audit to come out and let’s see, when we get it, what can be learned from it. What we already know is that the past Board of Directors failed miserably.

Comments

  1. You might not be aware that 4 months is relatively quick for an annual audit. They have 6 months following the end of the fiscal year.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for your comment. I am aware of the six month deadline to produce an audit. But in the present circumstances (successive deficits, changes in personnel) I would expect a responsible Board of Directors to act quickly in order to reestablish its credibility and inform the members that ''things are now under control''. The sooner the better!

      Delete
    2. Yes, they should absolutely rush things so that you can get out another blog post complaining about the finances.

      Delete
  2. Anonymous, your mask is slipping. Seems like someone is a little too sensitive and potentially close to the situation. I would say be careful what you do in a glass house, but the LC house is anything but transparent; translucent at best.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Poor assessment, and poor assumptions. This blog is generally full of inaccurate posts and massively biased opinions of the authors. They show a severe lack of understanding of how governance processes work.

      Delete
  3. How can an association that was democratically structured move to a structure that is authoritarian and so poorly managed? We restructured in 1986 as a result of fiscal mismanagement! How is the current new structure an improvement? All structures should be reviewed and an assessment for improvement made! This process should be transparent and changes made show the benefits to the members! I have concerns that we have regressed!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous, nice attempt of gaslighting. The Author (even though I'm hearing he's heavily influenced by Bailey and OLA) knows in great detail of the policy and inner working. your attempt to discredit him says more about you than it does him or your accusations. But the aforementioned involvement with the OLA is concerning and apparent as to why he does not question the atrocities in that organization - which can be argued are far more egregious than LC's. Both things can be true. He is right about LC and ignoring/in-bed with the OLA.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If the Authour doesn’t want people to comment on his errors, maybe he should try presenting a more factual and informed analysis. Numerous glaring errors have been pointed out, and he ignores them. He rants about not having a published schedule of board meetings and not promoting new meetings minutes to members. The entire premise of this article is flawed to begin with. Ranting about not having audited statements well before the deadline to publish them. All suggests either a lack of understanding or a deliberate attempt to distort the truth.

      Delete
    2. NSOs don’t provide quarterly statements to members. They provide annual audited statements. The Author maybe needs to read up on the standard approach taken by the 60+ national sport organizations in Canada. Having flawed expectations, and then posting repeated rants from a flawed starting point is a recipe for pointless ranting.

      Delete
  5. Lots of challenges for Lacrosse Canada, and I hope we/they overcome them. Our needs some long-term thinking and (this may sound boring) focus on the fundamentals. (grassroots growth and sound financial management). It's a shame that, since the era of government funding of our National Governing Body, this is the second time there have been some (alleged) financial improprieties.

    It's good to see that (at least) with this forum there is some focus and discussion on governance and management. Getting this right could do so much for the sport. We've under-achieved for so long (IMO).

    Of historical note, Barbara Lockhart is the first ever female President of the Association. In 115 years, she is the 49th President.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Anonymous, I don't think (even once) the other mentioned anything about not wanting people to comment on his errors - even if there are any. During your hissy fit you missed the point completely. Point being that if LC want to try and rebuild trust they should be going above and beyond to clean up the shit show left behind by Terry.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. His response and actions suggest he isn't interested in feedback or any critical thoughts about what he is ranting about. Expecting a new board, new ED and new staff to rush out an audit is irresponsible. That is the point you and the esteemed author are missing.

      Delete
    2. Just because you say he "isn't interested in feedback or critical thoughts" and haven't shown any evidence, it's just a claim, you're gaslighting. You just keep saying "LC doesn't have to rush to provide an audit"... ok great they don't. But the Author is stating they SHOULD to help show the Membership they're dedicated to transparency and change. You are EXACTLY what's wrong with lacrosse "we don't have to so we're not going to do it". But if they DID do it, it would help rebuild trust - exactly what he has been writing about. Do us a favour, if you're involved in the game; pause, reflect, and if you think you don't have to do something just because it isn't in your policy - resign.

      Delete

Post a Comment